Page 30 |
Previous | 31 of 129 | Next |
|
|
small (250x250 max)
medium (500x500 max)
Large
Extra Large
large ( > 500x500)
Full Resolution
|
Loading content ...
30 Thirty-Sixth Biennial Report flicting interpretations can be eliminated by changing the State Board of Health restaurant regulations to allow bulk milk dispensers "where permitted under the regulations of the local Board of Health." If the State Board of Health should decide to make this change, the clause quoted could be inserted on line 8 of Item 17 (page 27), between the words '*that" and "sanitary." With this change, the third sentence of Item 17 would read as follows (addition underlined): "Milk and milk products shall be served in the individual, original containers in which they were received from the distributor, so that the name and grade of the contents and the name of the milk distributor may be oberved readily by the consumers; provided that, where permitted under the regulations of the local Board of Health, sanitary bulk milk dispensers which have been approved by the State Board of Health may be used if so locatcd and so labeled that the name and grade of the contents and the name of the milk distributor may be observed readily by the consumers; provided further, that in the case of restaurants and hotels having several banquet halls and dining rooms served from a central kitchen, if careful investigation proves it impractical to locate the milk dispenser in a dining room because of established food checking and serving routines, the milk dispenser may be installed in the food serving area of the kitchen in a location specifically approved by the health officer and the label information required by this item shall be shown prominently on the menu cards instead of on the milk dispenser cabinet." Dr. Lawrence moved that the revision be adopted. Dr. Bender seconded. At Dr. Norton's request, Mr. Andrews reported on how the Howard Johnson litigation was settled. He also commented that relations with Howard Johnson Restaurants is, in general, good. Dr. Foard gave a brief report on the distribution of polio vaccine with a total allocation to date for North Carolina of about 940,000 ccs. from Federal funds. Dr. Norton read a letter from Dr. LeRoy Hand, Jr., Gatesville, which had been published in the News and Observer. He reported that he had written Wyeth and Lilly for comments on Dr. Hand's letter. Dr. Norton asked Dr. Foard to give a brief report on Cabarrus County. A little more than 80 per cent of the children under 20 in Cabarrus County have been given two doses of polio vaccine, and the County Medical Society has requested enough vaccine to make a hundred per cent. The Public Health Service plans to use Cabarrus County in a study on the effects of administration of polio vaccine. Practically all of the vaccinations were done by the health department—the Medical Society advocated that people go to the health department. Dr. Norton reported that he and Dr. Rousseau both feel that the usefulness and necessity for the Polio Advisory Committee has just about ended, from the standpoint of having anything other than the State Board of Health pick up and carry on from there. Dr. Rousseau is in complete agreement and actually recommends that we go ahead and make a report to the Governor on the progress of the vaccination against polio. He suggested that Dr. Norton gather up the information, summarize it and take it over to the Governor and suggest to him that he terminate the Advisory Committee and designate the State Board of Health to follow-up with
Object Description
Rating | |
Fixed Title * | NCHH-02: Biennial Report of the North Carolina State Board of Health [1909-1972] |
Document Title | Biennial Report of the North Carolina State Board of Health [1909-1972] |
Subject Name | North Carolina. State Board of Health -- Statistics -- Periodicals. |
Subject Topical | Public health -- North Carolina -- Statistics -- Periodicals. |
Subject Topical Other | Public Health -- North Carolina. |
Description | Publication began with the 13th (1909/1910) and ceased with the 44th (1970/1972) |
Creator | North Carolina. State Board of Health. |
Publisher | Raleigh : The Board, 1911- |
Repository | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Health Sciences Library. |
Host | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |
Date | 1954-1956 |
Identifier | NCHH-02-036 |
Form General | Periodicals |
Language | English |
Rights | This item is part of the North Carolina History of Health Digital Collection. Some materials in the Collection are protected by U.S. copyright law. This item is presented by the Health Sciences Library of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for research and educational purposes. It may not be republished or distributed without permission of the Health Sciences Library. |
Digital Collection | North Carolina History of Health Digital Collection |
Sponsor | The North Carolina History of Health Digital Collection is an open access publishing initiative of the Health Sciences Library of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Financial support for the initiative was provided in part by a multi-year NC ECHO (Exploring Cultural Heritage Online) digitization grant, awarded by the State Library of North Carolina, and funded through the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA). |
Volume Number | 36 |
Health Discipline | Public Health |
Digital Format | JPEG 2000 |
Print / Download PDF Version | http://archives.hsl.unc.edu/nchh/nchh-02/nchh-02-036.pdf |
Document Sort | all; group-a; nchh-02 |
Volume Link | http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/search/collection/nchh/field/identi/searchterm/NCHH-02-036 |
Title Link | http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/search/collection/nchh/field/documa/searchterm/NCHH-02 |
Catalog Record link | http://search.lib.unc.edu/search?R=UNCb2375275 |
Description
Fixed Title * | Page 30 |
Document Title | Biennial Report of the North Carolina State Board of Health [1909-1972] |
Subject Name | North Carolina. State Board of Health -- Statistics -- Periodicals. |
Subject Topical | Public health -- North Carolina -- Statistics -- Periodicals. |
Subject Topical Other | Public Health -- North Carolina. |
Description | Publication began with the 13th (1909/1910) and ceased with the 44th (1970/1972) |
Creator | North Carolina. State Board of Health. |
Publisher | Raleigh : The Board, 1911- |
Repository | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Health Sciences Library. |
Host | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |
Date | 1954-1956 |
Identifier | NCHH-02-036-0034 |
Form General | Periodicals |
Page Type | all; report/review; organizational news |
Language | English |
Rights | This item is part of the North Carolina History of Health Digital Collection. Some materials in the Collection are protected by U.S. copyright law. This item is presented by the Health Sciences Library of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for research and educational purposes. It may not be republished or distributed without permission of the Health Sciences Library. |
Filename | biennialreportof36nort_0034.jp2 |
Digital Collection | North Carolina History of Health Digital Collection |
Sponsor | The North Carolina History of Health Digital Collection is an open access publishing initiative of the Health Sciences Library of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Financial support for the initiative was provided in part by a multi-year NC ECHO (Exploring Cultural Heritage Online) digitization grant, awarded by the State Library of North Carolina, and funded through the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA). |
Volume Number | 36 |
Page Number | 30 |
Health Discipline | Public Health |
Full Text | 30 Thirty-Sixth Biennial Report flicting interpretations can be eliminated by changing the State Board of Health restaurant regulations to allow bulk milk dispensers "where permitted under the regulations of the local Board of Health." If the State Board of Health should decide to make this change, the clause quoted could be inserted on line 8 of Item 17 (page 27), between the words '*that" and "sanitary." With this change, the third sentence of Item 17 would read as follows (addition underlined): "Milk and milk products shall be served in the individual, original containers in which they were received from the distributor, so that the name and grade of the contents and the name of the milk distributor may be oberved readily by the consumers; provided that, where permitted under the regulations of the local Board of Health, sanitary bulk milk dispensers which have been approved by the State Board of Health may be used if so locatcd and so labeled that the name and grade of the contents and the name of the milk distributor may be observed readily by the consumers; provided further, that in the case of restaurants and hotels having several banquet halls and dining rooms served from a central kitchen, if careful investigation proves it impractical to locate the milk dispenser in a dining room because of established food checking and serving routines, the milk dispenser may be installed in the food serving area of the kitchen in a location specifically approved by the health officer and the label information required by this item shall be shown prominently on the menu cards instead of on the milk dispenser cabinet." Dr. Lawrence moved that the revision be adopted. Dr. Bender seconded. At Dr. Norton's request, Mr. Andrews reported on how the Howard Johnson litigation was settled. He also commented that relations with Howard Johnson Restaurants is, in general, good. Dr. Foard gave a brief report on the distribution of polio vaccine with a total allocation to date for North Carolina of about 940,000 ccs. from Federal funds. Dr. Norton read a letter from Dr. LeRoy Hand, Jr., Gatesville, which had been published in the News and Observer. He reported that he had written Wyeth and Lilly for comments on Dr. Hand's letter. Dr. Norton asked Dr. Foard to give a brief report on Cabarrus County. A little more than 80 per cent of the children under 20 in Cabarrus County have been given two doses of polio vaccine, and the County Medical Society has requested enough vaccine to make a hundred per cent. The Public Health Service plans to use Cabarrus County in a study on the effects of administration of polio vaccine. Practically all of the vaccinations were done by the health department—the Medical Society advocated that people go to the health department. Dr. Norton reported that he and Dr. Rousseau both feel that the usefulness and necessity for the Polio Advisory Committee has just about ended, from the standpoint of having anything other than the State Board of Health pick up and carry on from there. Dr. Rousseau is in complete agreement and actually recommends that we go ahead and make a report to the Governor on the progress of the vaccination against polio. He suggested that Dr. Norton gather up the information, summarize it and take it over to the Governor and suggest to him that he terminate the Advisory Committee and designate the State Board of Health to follow-up with |
Digital Format | JPEG 2000 |
Print / Download PDF Version | http://archives.hsl.unc.edu/nchh/nchh-02/nchh-02-036.pdf |
Document Sort | all; group-a; nchh-02 |
Volume Link | http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/search/collection/nchh/field/identi/searchterm/NCHH-02-036 |
Title Link | http://dc.lib.unc.edu/cdm/search/collection/nchh/field/documa/searchterm/NCHH-02 |
Catalog Record link | http://search.lib.unc.edu/search?R=UNCb2375275 |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 30